"Jobs
for All":
Another Dream of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
By
Mathew Forstater, Director, Center for Full Employment and Price
Stability, University of Missouri-Kansas City
[2002] The
1963 "March on Washington" was officially named the "March on
Washington for Jobs and Freedom," a detail that often gets
lost amid the important celebration of the general achievement
and highlights such as the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s
"I Have a Dream" oration. Indeed, the theme of job creation runs
though Dr. King's writings. Perhaps no single policy could have
as great a social and economic impact on the African American
community (and the entire country) as federally funded job assurance
for every person ready and willing to work. This is a policy approach
that was explicitly supported by Dr. King, and that is currently
receiving attention in economic and policy circles.
In
an article in Look published just after his assassination
(King, 1968), Dr. King wrote that: "We call our demonstration
a campaign for jobs and income because we feel that the economic
question is the most crucial that black people, and poor people
generally, are confronting." Thirty-three years later, at the
peak of a peacetime economic expansion heralded as the longest
and strongest in recent history, not only is the African American
unemployment rate stuck at twice that of whites, but at around
8% [see current rate] that figure remains at a rate that would be considered evidence
of a deep recession were it to hold for
society as a whole:
There
is a literal depression in the Negro community. When you have
mass unemployment in the Negro community, it's called a
social problem; when you have mass unemployment in the white
community, it's called a depression. The fact is, there is a
major depression in the Negro community. The unemployment rate
is extremely high, and among Negro youth, it goes up as high
as forty percent in some cities. (King, 1968)
Yet
another generation has had to witness the inability of a 'booming'
economy to provide gainful employment for every person willing and
able to work, a point well understood by Dr. King:
Economic
expansion alone cannot do the job of improving the employment
situation of Negroes. It provides the base for improvement but
other things must be constructed upon it, especially if the
tragic situation of youth is to be solved. In a booming economy
Negro youth are afflicted with unemployment as though in an
economic crisis. They are the explosive outsiders of the American
expansion. (King, 1967)
As
politicians and media figures laud the relatively lower aggregate
unemployment rates and the 'success' of 'welfare reform', more careful
observers note the hidden unemployment official numbers do not account
for and caution the optimists that the real test of the 'Personal
Responsibility Act' will be as the economy goes into recession.
Official unemployment figures go down not only when the unemployed
find work, but when 'discouraged workers' drop out of the labor
force, a process with harsh consequences:
[T]he
expansion of private employment and nonprofessional opportunities
cannot, however, provide full employment for Negroes. Many youths
are not listed as unemployed because in despair they have left
the labor market completely. They are psychologically disabled
and cannot be rescued by conventional employment. (King, 1967)
Those
in prison are also disproportionately young, black, and male and
are also not included in official unemployment figures. Combined
with other recent developments such as the exploding homicide rates
for young, Black men (itself linked to the 'war on drugs') and the
return of the death penalty (with a disproportionately young, Black,
male death row), this explains the decline in marriageable-age Black
men--unlike 'welfare incentives' a factor with some explanatory
power in understanding the decline of the two-parent family among
African Americans (see Darity and Myers, 1994). As Dr. King well-understood,
what emerges is a system that excludes many young African American
women and men from participating, and creative policy measures are
required to respond effectively and fairly to this challenge:
There
are also some Negro youth who have faced so many closed doors
and so many crippling defeats that they have lost motivation.
For those youth who are alienated from the routines of work,
there should be...work situations which permit flexibility...until
they can manage the demands of the typical workplace. (King,
1967, p. 126)
The
private sector, even in the "best of times" is unable to provide
jobs for all. Moreover, racial wage and employment gaps are not
fully explained by human capital, i.e. differences in skill and
education levels. Dr. King's alternative explanation points to the
functional role of racial economic inequality in modern capitalism:
Depressed
living standards for Negroes are not simply the consequence of
neglect. Nor can they be explained by the myth of the Negro's
innate incapacities, or by more sophisticated rationalization
of his acquired infirmities (family disorganization, poor education,
etc.). They are a structural part of the economic system in the
United States Certain industries are based on a supply of low-paid,
under-skilled and immobile nonwhite labor. (King, 1967, p. 7)
Now
we realize that economic dislocations in the market operations
of our economy and the prevalence of discrimination thrust people
into idleness and bind them in constant or frequent unemployment
against their will. Today the poor are less often dismissed,
I hope, from our consciences by being branded as inferior or
incompetent. We also know that no matter how dynamically the
economy develops and expands, it does not eliminate all poverty.
(King, 1972 [1968])
Unfortunately,
Dr. King's hope has not been realized, as 'culture of poverty' and
even bio-genetic theories continue to rear their ugly heads. The
resurrection of these frameworks by authors such as Dinesh D'Souza,
Thomas Sowell, and Charles Murray is in part a response to the failure
of human capital theory. But their reemergence is also part of the
trend toward greater discrimination as the racial education and
skills gaps are closed--evidence further supporting the functional
theory of racial economic inequality (Darity and Hamilton, 2001).
Speaking of Black men, but of a process also relevant to the African
American female experience, Dr. King wrote that:
The
quest of the Negro male for employment was always frustrating.
If he lacked skill, he was only occasionally wanted because
such employment as he could find had little regularity and even
less remuneration. If he had a skill, he also had his black
skin, and discrimination locked doors against him. In the competition
for scarce jobs he was a loser because he was born that way.
(King, 1967, pp. 106-07)
In
addressing these tremendous challenges, Dr. King's writings have
a laser-like focus on job creation as addressing multiple concerns
and carrying multiple benefits:
The
nation will also have to find the answer to full employment,
including a more imaginative approach than has yet been conceived
for neutralizing the perils of automation. Today, as the skilled
and semiskilled Negro attempts to mount the ladder of economic
security, he finds himself in competition with the white working
man at the very time when automation is scrapping forty thousand
jobs a week. Though this is perhaps the inevitable product of
social and economic upheaval, it is an intolerable situation,
and Negroes will not long permit themselves to be pitted against
white workers for an ever-decreasing supply of jobs. The energetic
and creative expansion of work opportunities, in both the public
and private sectors of our economy, is an imperative worthy
of the richest nation on earth, whose abundance is an embarrassment
as long as millions of poor are imprisoned and constantly self-renewed
within an expanding population. (King, 1963)
Dr.
King reiterated over and over again his proposal that "government...
become an employer of last resort" (King, 1971 [1963): "We need
an economic bill of rights. This would guarantee a job to all people
who want to work and are able to work. It would mean creating certain
public-service jobs" (King, 1968):
We
must develop a federal program of public works, retraining,
and jobs for all--so that none, white or black, will have cause
to feel threatened. At the present time, thousands of jobs a
week are disappearing in the wake of automation and other production
efficiency techniques. (King, 1965)
Dr.
King's proposal was that anyone ready and willing to work would
be assured a public service job. His vision thus extended to all
those left behind, including unemployed and poor whites:
While
Negroes form the vast majority of America's disadvantaged, there
are millions of white poor who would also benefit from such a
bill. The moral justification for special measures for Negroes
is rooted in the robberies inherent in the institution of slavery.
Many poor whites, however, were the derivative victims of slavery.
As long as labor was cheapened by the involuntary servitude of
the black man, the freedom of white labor, especially in the South,
was little more than a myth. It was free only to bargain from
the depressed base imposed by slavery upon the whole of the labor
market. Nor did this derivative bondage end when formal slavery
gave way to the de-facto slavery of discrimination. To this day
the white poor also suffer deprivation and the humiliation of
poverty if not of color. They are chained by the weight of discrimination,
though its badge of degradation does not mark them. It corrupts
their lives, frustrates their opportunities and withers their
education. In one sense it is more evil for them, because it has
confused so many by prejudice that they have supported their own
oppressors. (King, 1963)
Black
and white, we will all be harmed unless something grand
and imaginative is done. The unemployed, poverty-stricken white
man must be made to realize that he is in the very same boat
with the Negro. Together, they could exert massive pressure
on the government to get jobs for all. Together they could form
a grand alliance. Together, they could merge all people for
the good of all. (King, 1965)
Dr.
King clearly distinguished Public Service Job Assurance from 'training
programs'. Too often, he wrote, "'[t]raining' becomes a way of avoiding
the issue of unemployment" (King, 1967):
The
orientation...should be "Jobs First, Training Later." Unfortunately,
the job policy of the federal programs has largely been the
reverse, with the result that people are being trained for nonexistent
jobs. (King, 1967)
While
the development of skills and support of educational experiences
are important characteristics of Public Service Job Assurance, "The
jobs should nevertheless be jobs and understood as such, not given
the false label of 'training'." (King, 1967, pp. 196-199)
Referring
to the historical and structural socioeconomic experience of some
of the young and long-time discouraged, Dr. King envisioned Public
Service Jobs as providing them with "special work places where
their irregularity as workers can be accepted until they have
restored their habits of discipline" (1967). At the same time,
he insisted that "we need to be concerned that the potential of
the individual is not wasted" (King, 1967). For Dr. King, Public
Service Job Assurance is capable of reconciling these various
requirements, as it is conceived around the idea that "New forms
of work that enhance the social good will have to be devised for
those for whom traditional jobs are not available" (King, 1967).
In
Where do We Go From Here? (1967), Dr. King elaborated his
vision of Public Service Job Assurance. First, development of
skills and education are outcomes, not prerequisites, of the program.
Second, the jobs are producing community and public services that
are in short supply and that benefit the neediest communities.
Third, the program generates incomes for individuals and families
that have unmet needs. Fourth, there are numerous social-psychological
benefits for individuals, families, communities, and the nation:
The
big, new, attractive thrust of Negro employment is in the nonprofessional
services. A high percentage of these jobs is in public employment.
The human services (medical attention, social services,
neighborhood amenities of various kinds) are in scarce supply
in this country, especially in localitiesof poverty. The traditional
way of providing manpower for these jobs 'degree-granting programs'
cannot fill all the niches that are opening up. The traditional
job requirements are a barrier to attaining an adequate supply
of personnel, especially if the number of jobs expands to meet
existing need.
The
expansion of the human services can be the missing industry
that will soak up the unemployment that persists in the United
States. [It can be the] the missing industry that would change
the employment scene in America. The expansion of human
services is that industry--it is labor intensive, requiring
manpower immediately rather than heavy capital investment
as in construction or other fields; it fills a great need
not met by private enterprise; it involves labor that can
be trained and developed on the job.
The
growth of the human services should be rapid. It should be
developed in a manner insuring that the jobs that will
be generated will not primarily be for professionals with
college and postgraduate diplomas but for people from the
neighborhoods who can perform important functions for their
neighbors. As with private enterprise, rigid credentials
have monopolized the entry routes into human services employment.
But...less educated people can do many of the tasks now performed
by the highly educated as well as many other new and necessary
tasks. (King, 1967, original emphasis, pp. 197-98)
Public
Service Job Assurance provides the framework for income maintenance,
skill development, and community service provisioning. Dr. King
also believed that it could support goals in other areas, such as
housing and education:
Work
of this sort could be enormously increased, and we are likely
to find that the problems of housing and education, instead
of preceding the elimination of poverty, will themselves be
affected if poverty is first abolished. The poor transformed
into purchasers will do a great deal on their own to alter housing
decay. (King, 1972 [1968])
Health
and childcare are other areas where Public Service Job Assurance
may serve as the vehicle for progressive social policies. If the
Public Service wage-benefits package included medical coverage and
childcare, not only would this guarantee Public Service workers
and their families coverage, but it also could pressure firms in
the private sector to match such benefits. Failure to do so could
leave firms unable to attract workers to their places of employment.
Individuals
develop skills and work habits and provide community service,
with the effects reverberating throughout the social fabric of
society. The benefits of Job Assurance are potentially widespread
and all-pervasive:
Beyond
these advantages, a host of positive psychological changes inevitably
will result from widespread economic security. The dignity of
the individual will flourish when the decisions concerning his
life are in his own hands, when he has the means to seek self-improvement.
Personal conflicts...will diminish when the unjust measurement
of human worth on a scale of dollars is eliminated. (King, 1972
[1968])
I
am positive, moreover, that the money spent would be more
than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to
the nation through the spectacular decline in school dropouts,
family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief
rolls, rioting and other social evils. (King, 1965)
Of
course, Dr. King recognized that Public Service Job Assurance could
not take the place of all social programs. He therefore supported
comprehensive legislation that would:
guarantee
an income to all who are not able to work. Some people are too
young, some are too old, some are physically disabled, and yet
in order to live, they need an income. (King, 1968)
The
Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. supported Public Service Job Assurance
throughout his life. It was a concrete part of his Dream, but he
did not view it as utopian or overly-idealistic: "This country has
the resources to solve any problem once that problem is accepted
as national policy" (King, 1965). By supporting the provision of
community services, "[i]t raises the possibility of rebuilding America
so that private
affluence is not accompanied by public squalor of slums and distress"
(King, 1968). In 1963, he wrote: "I would challenge skeptics to
give such a bold new approach a test for the next decade" (King,
1963). We know that unfortunately we did not take up his challenge
at that time, but it is not too late to take up that challenge now,
as we enter the new millennium.
What
better way to celebrate the Dream and the Vision of Dr. King?
Bibliography
of Work Cited by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
King,
Jr., Martin Luther, 1963, Why We Can't Wait, New York:
New American Library.
Interview
with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 1965, Playboy, January,
117ff.
King,
Jr. Martin Luther, 1967, Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or
Community?, New York: Harper & Row.
King,
Jr., Martin Luther, 1968, "Showdown for Nonviolence," Look,
Vol. 32, April 16, pp. 23-25.
Dr.
King's last letter requesting support for his March on Washington,
quoted in Robert Goodman, 1971, After the Planners, New
York: Simon and Schuster, p. 32.
King,
Jr., Martin Luther, 1972 [1968], "New Sense of Direction," Worldview,
15, April.
Other
Works Cited
Carlson,
Ellen, and William F. Mitchell (eds.), 2000, The Path to Full
Employment and Equity, ELRR: Economic and Labour Relations
Review, Supplement to Volume 11.
Darity,
Jr., William A. and Samuel L. Myers, Jr. (with Emmett D. Carson
and William Sabol), 1994, The Black Underclass: Critical Essays
on Race and Unwantedness, New York: Garland.
Darity,
Jr., William A. and Darrick Hamilton, 2001, "A Test of the Functionality
of Discrimination," presented at Allied Social Science Annual
Meetings, New Orleans, January.
Warner,
Aaron, Mathew Forstater, and Sumner Rosen (eds.), 2000, Commitment
to Full Employment, Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
Wray,
L. Randall, 1998, Understanding Modern Money: The Key To Full
Employment and Price Stability, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
|